Xeon Gold 6338 vs Celeron E3300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron E3300
2009, $70
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.48
Xeon Gold 6338
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 205 Watt
22.82
+4654%

Xeon Gold 6338 outperforms Celeron E3300 by a whopping 4654% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3154289
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.83no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency0.7911.94
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)no data
Release date30 August 2009 (16 years ago)1 April 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$70no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Celeron E3300 and Xeon Gold 6338 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads264
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (shared)no data
L3 cache0 KB48 MB
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm
Die size82 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature74 °C81 °C
Number of transistors228 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E3300 and Xeon Gold 6338 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketLGA775FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E3300 and Xeon Gold 6338. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron E3300 and Xeon Gold 6338 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E3300 and Xeon Gold 6338 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E3300 and Xeon Gold 6338. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron E3300 and Xeon Gold 6338.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Celeron E3300 0.48
Xeon Gold 6338 22.82
+4654%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Celeron E3300 846
Samples: 258
Xeon Gold 6338 40225
+4655%
Samples: 6

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.48 22.82
Recency 30 August 2009 1 April 2021
Physical cores 2 32
Threads 2 64
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 205 Watt

Celeron E3300 has 215.4% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6338, on the other hand, has a 4654.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Xeon Gold 6338 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron E3300 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron E3300 is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 6338 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron E3300
Celeron E3300
Intel Xeon Gold 6338
Xeon Gold 6338

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 189 votes

Rate Celeron E3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 18 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6338 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron E3300 and Xeon Gold 6338, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.