i9-9980XE vs Celeron E3200

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron E3200
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.57
Core i9-9980XE
2018
18 cores / 36 threads, 165 Watt
18.34
+3118%

Core i9-9980XE outperforms Celeron E3200 by a whopping 3118% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron E3200 and Core i9-9980XE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2833329
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.883.94
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Core i9
Power efficiency0.8310.51
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
Release date30 August 2009 (15 years ago)19 October 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$52$1,979

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-9980XE has 37% better value for money than Celeron E3200.

Detailed specifications

Celeron E3200 and Core i9-9980XE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)18 (Octadeca-Core)
Threads236
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data30
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (shared)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB24.75 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size82 mm2484 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °C84 °C
Number of transistors228 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E3200 and Core i9-9980XE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketLGA775FCLGA2066
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E3200 and Core i9-9980XE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+

Security technologies

Celeron E3200 and Core i9-9980XE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E3200 and Core i9-9980XE are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E3200 and Core i9-9980XE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data85.33 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron E3200 and Core i9-9980XE.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data44

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron E3200 0.57
i9-9980XE 18.34
+3118%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron E3200 900
i9-9980XE 29127
+3136%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.57 18.34
Recency 30 August 2009 19 October 2018
Physical cores 2 18
Threads 2 36
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 165 Watt

Celeron E3200 has 153.8% lower power consumption.

i9-9980XE, on the other hand, has a 3117.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 800% more physical cores and 1700% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i9-9980XE is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron E3200 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron E3200 and Core i9-9980XE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron E3200
Celeron E3200
Intel Core i9-9980XE
Core i9-9980XE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 76 votes

Rate Celeron E3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 102 votes

Rate Core i9-9980XE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron E3200 or Core i9-9980XE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.