Celeron T3100 vs E3200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron E3200
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.56
+47.4%

Celeron E3200 outperforms Celeron T3100 by a considerable 47% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron E3200 and Celeron T3100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28393030
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.88no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency0.821.03
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)no data
Release date30 August 2009 (15 years ago)1 July 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$52no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron E3200 and Celeron T3100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)no data
Threads2no data
Base clock speed2.4 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (shared)no data
L3 cache0 KB1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size82 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature74 °C105 °C
Number of transistors228 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625V1V-1.25V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E3200 and Celeron T3100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketLGA775BGA479,PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E3200 and Celeron T3100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Celeron E3200 and Celeron T3100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E3200 and Celeron T3100 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E3200 and Celeron T3100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron E3200 and Celeron T3100.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron E3200 0.56
+47.4%
Celeron T3100 0.38

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron E3200 900
+47.5%
Celeron T3100 610

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.56 0.38
Recency 30 August 2009 1 July 2008
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron E3200 has a 47.4% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

Celeron T3100, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Celeron E3200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron T3100 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron E3200 is a desktop processor while Celeron T3100 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron E3200 and Celeron T3100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron E3200
Celeron E3200
Intel Celeron T3100
Celeron T3100

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 76 votes

Rate Celeron E3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 18 votes

Rate Celeron T3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron E3200 or Celeron T3100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.