Celeron G460 vs E3200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron E3200
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.57
+90%
Celeron G460
2011
1 core / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.30

Celeron E3200 outperforms Celeron G460 by an impressive 90% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron E3200 and Celeron G460 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28343121
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.88no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.830.81
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date30 August 2009 (15 years ago)12 December 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$52$65

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron E3200 and Celeron G460 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.4 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB
L2 cache1 MB (shared)256 KB
L3 cache0 KB1.5 MB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size82 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °C66 °C
Number of transistors228 million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E3200 and Celeron G460 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E3200 and Celeron G460. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Celeron E3200 and Celeron G460 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E3200 and Celeron G460 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E3200 and Celeron G460. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data17 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Intel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron E3200 and Celeron G460 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron E3200 and Celeron G460.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron E3200 0.57
+90%
Celeron G460 0.30

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron E3200 900
+91.9%
Celeron G460 469

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.57 0.30
Recency 30 August 2009 12 December 2011
Physical cores 2 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron E3200 has a 90% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores.

Celeron G460, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Celeron E3200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G460 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron E3200 and Celeron G460, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron E3200
Celeron E3200
Intel Celeron G460
Celeron G460

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 76 votes

Rate Celeron E3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 30 votes

Rate Celeron G460 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron E3200 or Celeron G460, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.