i5-8265U vs Celeron E1600
Aggregate performance score
i5-8265U outperforms Celeron E1600 by a whopping 613% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron E1600 and Core i5-8265U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 2814 | 1444 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | no data | Intel Core i5 |
Architecture codename | Allendale (2006−2009) | Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) |
Release date | 31 May 2009 (15 years ago) | 28 August 2018 (6 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $297 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron E1600 and Core i5-8265U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 8 |
Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
Bus type | no data | OPI |
Bus rate | no data | 4 GT/s |
Multiplier | no data | 16 |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB (shared) | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 6 MB |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | 77 mm2 | 123 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 73 °C | 100 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
Number of transistors | 105 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.5V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron E1600 and Core i5-8265U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
Socket | LGA775 | FCBGA1528 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E1600 and Core i5-8265U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Speed Shift | no data | + |
My WiFi | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
Idle States | + | + |
Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
Smart Response | no data | + |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
FSB parity | - | no data |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Celeron E1600 and Core i5-8265U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | - |
EDB | + | + |
Secure Key | no data | + |
Identity Protection | - | + |
SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® ME |
OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E1600 and Core i5-8265U are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-d | - | + |
VT-x | - | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E1600 and Core i5-8265U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR4 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 38.397 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Intel® UHD Graphics for 8th Generation Intel® Processors |
Max video memory | no data | 32 GB |
Quick Sync Video | - | + |
Clear Video | no data | + |
Clear Video HD | no data | + |
Graphics max frequency | no data | 1.1 GHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron E1600 and Core i5-8265U integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
eDP | no data | + |
DisplayPort | - | + |
HDMI | - | + |
DVI | no data | + |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron E1600 and Core i5-8265U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
4K resolution support | no data | + |
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096x2304@24Hz |
Max resolution over eDP | no data | 4096x2304@60Hz |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 4096x2304@60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron E1600 and Core i5-8265U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | no data | 12 |
OpenGL | no data | 4.5 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron E1600 and Core i5-8265U.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.54 | 3.85 |
Recency | 31 May 2009 | 28 August 2018 |
Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
Threads | 2 | 8 |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
i5-8265U has a 613% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.
The Core i5-8265U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron E1600 in performance tests.
Note that Celeron E1600 is a desktop processor while Core i5-8265U is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron E1600 and Core i5-8265U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.