Ultra 9 288V vs Celeron E1600

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron E1600
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.53
Core Ultra 9 288V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 30 Watt
12.44
+2247%

Core Ultra 9 288V outperforms Celeron E1600 by a whopping 2247% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron E1600 and Core Ultra 9 288V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2862624
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency0.7739.04
Architecture codenameAllendale (2006−2009)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date31 May 2009 (15 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron E1600 and Core Ultra 9 288V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rateno data37 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)192 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (shared)2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm3 nm
Die size77 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature73 °C100 °C
Number of transistors105 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E1600 and Core Ultra 9 288V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E1600 and Core Ultra 9 288V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron E1600 and Core Ultra 9 288V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E1600 and Core Ultra 9 288V are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E1600 and Core Ultra 9 288V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Arc 140V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron E1600 and Core Ultra 9 288V.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron E1600 0.53
Ultra 9 288V 12.44
+2247%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron E1600 840
Ultra 9 288V 19761
+2253%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.53 12.44
Recency 31 May 2009 24 September 2024
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 65 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 30 Watt

Ultra 9 288V has a 2247.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 2066.7% more advanced lithography process, and 116.7% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 9 288V is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron E1600 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron E1600 is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 9 288V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron E1600 and Core Ultra 9 288V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron E1600
Celeron E1600
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
Core Ultra 9 288V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 5 votes

Rate Celeron E1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 33 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 288V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron E1600 or Core Ultra 9 288V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.