Ultra 9 285 vs Celeron E1600

Primary details

Comparing Celeron E1600 and Core Ultra 9 285 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2851not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.77no data
Architecture codenameAllendale (2006−2009)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date31 May 2009 (15 years ago)January 2025

Detailed specifications

Celeron E1600 and Core Ultra 9 285 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads224
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz5.6 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (shared)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm3 nm
Die size77 mm2243 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistors105 million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E1600 and Core Ultra 9 285 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA7751851
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E1600 and Core Ultra 9 285. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron E1600 and Core Ultra 9 285 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E1600 and Core Ultra 9 285 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E1600 and Core Ultra 9 285. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR5 Depends on motherboard

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Arc Xe2 Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron E1600 and Core Ultra 9 285.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 24
Threads 2 24
Chip lithography 65 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 125 Watt

Celeron E1600 has 92.3% lower power consumption.

Ultra 9 285, on the other hand, has 1100% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 2066.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron E1600 and Core Ultra 9 285. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron E1600 and Core Ultra 9 285, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron E1600
Celeron E1600
Intel Core Ultra 9 285
Core Ultra 9 285

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 5 votes

Rate Celeron E1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 70 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron E1600 or Core Ultra 9 285, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.