Xeon Phi 7210 vs Celeron E1200
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Phi 7210 outperforms Celeron E1200 by a whopping 1338% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3405 | 1558 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 0.19 | 0.82 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Allendale (2006−2009) | Knights Landing (2016) |
| Release date | 20 January 2008 (18 years ago) | 20 June 2016 (9 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $40 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron E1200 and Xeon Phi 7210 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 256 |
| Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 32 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (shared) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 77 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 73 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 105 million | 8,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.5V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron E1200 and Xeon Phi 7210 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | LGA775 | 3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 215 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E1200 and Xeon Phi 7210. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron E1200 and Xeon Phi 7210 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E1200 and Xeon Phi 7210 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | + |
| VT-x | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E1200 and Xeon Phi 7210. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron E1200 and Xeon Phi 7210.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.29 | 4.17 |
| Recency | 20 January 2008 | 20 June 2016 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 64 |
| Threads | 2 | 256 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 215 Watt |
Celeron E1200 has 230.8% lower power consumption.
Xeon Phi 7210, on the other hand, has a 1337.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 3100% more physical cores and 12700% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.
The Intel Xeon Phi 7210 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron E1200 in performance tests.
Note that Celeron E1200 is a desktop processor while Xeon Phi 7210 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
