Atom D510 vs Celeron E1200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron E1200
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.32
+23.1%
Atom D510
2009
2 cores / 4 threads, 13 Watt
0.26

Celeron E1200 outperforms Atom D510 by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron E1200 and Atom D510 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30783144
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency0.471.89
Architecture codenameAllendale (2006−2009)Pineview (2009−2011)
Release dateJanuary 2008 (16 years ago)21 December 2009 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$40$97

Detailed specifications

Celeron E1200 and Atom D510 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.66 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.67 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (shared)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die size77 mm266 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °C100 °C
Number of transistors105 million176 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E1200 and Atom D510 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt13 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E1200 and Atom D510. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching--
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron E1200 and Atom D510 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E1200 and Atom D510 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x--

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E1200 and Atom D510. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR2
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB
Max memory channelsno data1
Maximum memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron E1200 0.32
+23.1%
Atom D510 0.26

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron E1200 516
+27.1%
Atom D510 406

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.32 0.26
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 13 Watt

Celeron E1200 has a 23.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Atom D510, on the other hand, has 100% more threads, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

The Celeron E1200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom D510 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron E1200 is a desktop processor while Atom D510 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron E1200 and Atom D510, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron E1200
Celeron E1200
Intel Atom D510
Atom D510

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 40 votes

Rate Celeron E1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 52 votes

Rate Atom D510 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron E1200 or Atom D510, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.