Xeon Gold 6326 vs Celeron Dual-Core T3500

Aggregate performance score

Celeron Dual-Core T3500
2010, $80
2 cores / 2 threads, 1 Watt
0.72
Xeon Gold 6326
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 185 Watt
19.15
+2560%

Xeon Gold 6326 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T3500 by a whopping 2560% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2905361
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-Coreno data
Power efficiencyno data11.09
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date26 September 2010 (15 years ago)6 April 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$80no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Xeon Gold 6326 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speedno data2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data78 °C
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Xeon Gold 6326 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketSocket P PGA478FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)1 MB185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Xeon Gold 6326. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Xeon Gold 6326 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Xeon Gold 6326 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Xeon Gold 6326. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Xeon Gold 6326.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 0.72
Xeon Gold 6326 19.15
+2560%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 1275
Samples: 241
Xeon Gold 6326 33764
+2548%
Samples: 12

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.72 19.15
Recency 26 September 2010 6 April 2021
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 32
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 1 Watt 185 Watt

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 has 18400% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6326, on the other hand, has a 2559.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Xeon Gold 6326 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron Dual-Core T3500 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 6326 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500
Celeron Dual-Core T3500
Intel Xeon Gold 6326
Xeon Gold 6326

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 112 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 30 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6326 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Xeon Gold 6326, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.