EPYC Embedded 3401 vs Celeron Dual-Core T3500
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2939 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Celeron Dual-Core | AMD EPYC Embedded |
| Power efficiency | 0.88 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 26 September 2010 (15 years ago) | 21 February 2018 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $80 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and EPYC Embedded 3401 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 1.85 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 18.5 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 1536 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 32 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 213 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | 9600 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and EPYC Embedded 3401 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | Socket P PGA478 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 85 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and EPYC Embedded 3401. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Security technologies
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and EPYC Embedded 3401 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and EPYC Embedded 3401 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and EPYC Embedded 3401. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1 TiB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 85.33 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 26 September 2010 | 21 February 2018 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 16 |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 85 Watt |
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 has 142.9% lower power consumption.
EPYC Embedded 3401, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and AMD EPYC Embedded 3401. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron Dual-Core T3500 is a notebook processor while EPYC Embedded 3401 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
