Duron 1600 vs Celeron Dual-Core T3500
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2905 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron Dual-Core | AMD Duron |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | K7 (2000−2004) |
| Release date | 26 September 2010 (15 years ago) | 15 August 2003 (22 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $80 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Duron 1600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 266.66 MT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 12 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 64 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 80.89 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | 37 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Duron 1600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | Socket P PGA478 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 1 MB | 57 Watt |
Security technologies
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Duron 1600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Duron 1600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 GB |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 26 September 2010 | 15 August 2003 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 1 Watt | 57 Watt |
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 has an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 188.9% more advanced lithography process, and 5600% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and AMD Duron 1600. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron Dual-Core T3500 is a notebook processor while Duron 1600 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
