Athlon X2 QL-62 vs Celeron Dual-Core T3500

Primary details

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Athlon X2 QL-62 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2593not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-Core2x AMD Athlon
Power efficiency2.16no data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Lion (2008−2009)
Release date26 September 2010 (14 years ago)3 June 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$80no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Athlon X2 QL-62 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz3600 MHz
L1 cache128 KB256 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Athlon X2 QL-62 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketSocket P PGA478S1g2
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Athlon X2 QL-62. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization
PowerNow-+

Security technologies

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Athlon X2 QL-62 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Athlon X2 QL-62 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 September 2010 3 June 2008
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Athlon X2 QL-62. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Athlon X2 QL-62, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500
Celeron Dual-Core T3500
AMD Athlon X2 QL-62
Athlon X2 QL-62

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 104 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 24 votes

Rate Athlon X2 QL-62 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core T3500 or Athlon X2 QL-62, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.