Athlon 64 X2 6400+ BE vs Celeron Dual-Core T3500
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2903 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron Dual-Core | no data |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Windsor (2006−2007) |
| Release date | 26 September 2010 (15 years ago) | August 2007 (18 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $80 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Athlon 64 X2 6400+ BE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 230 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | 227 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Athlon 64 X2 6400+ BE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | Socket P PGA478 | AM2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 1 MB | 125 Watt |
Security technologies
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Athlon 64 X2 6400+ BE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 1 Watt | 125 Watt |
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 12400% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and AMD Athlon 64 X2 6400+ BE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron Dual-Core T3500 is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 X2 6400+ BE is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
