A8-4557M vs Celeron Dual-Core T3500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2906not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-CoreAMD A-Series
DesignerIntelAMD
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date26 September 2010 (15 years ago)15 May 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$80no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and A8-4557M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache1 MB4 MB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size107 mm2246 mm2
Number of transistors410 Million1303 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and A8-4557M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketSocket P PGA478BGA
Power consumption (TDP)1 MB4 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and A8-4557M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Security technologies

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and A8-4557M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 7640G (497 - 655 MHz)

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 September 2010 15 May 2012
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 1 Watt 4 Watt

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 has 300% lower power consumption.

A8-4557M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and AMD A8-4557M. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500
Celeron Dual-Core T3500
AMD A8-4557M
A8-4557M

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 112 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate A8-4557M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and A8-4557M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.