Celeron M 350 vs Dual-Core T3300
Primary details
Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Celeron M 350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3006 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron Dual-Core | Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 1.08 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Dothan (2004−2005) |
| Release date | 1 February 2010 (14 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Celeron M 350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 400 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | no data | 1 MB L2 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.26V |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Celeron M 350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | Socket P 478 | PPGA478, H-PBGA479, H-PBGA478, PPGA479 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 21 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Celeron M 350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Celeron M 350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Celeron M 350 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 21 Watt |
Celeron Dual-Core T3300 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron M 350, on the other hand, has 66.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Celeron M 350. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Celeron M 350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
