Athlon XP-M 2600+ vs Celeron Dual-Core T3300

Primary details

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Athlon XP-M 2600+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-CoreAMD Athlon XP-M
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Barton (2001−2004)
Release date1 February 2010 (14 years ago)January 2001 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Athlon XP-M 2600+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.83 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rate800 MHz333 MT/s
Multiplierno data11
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm130 nm
Die sizeno data101 mm2
Number of transistorsno data54 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Athlon XP-M 2600+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketSocket P 478A
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Athlon XP-M 2600+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

PowerNow-+

Security technologies

Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Athlon XP-M 2600+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Athlon XP-M 2600+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 130 nm

Celeron Dual-Core T3300 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 188.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Athlon XP-M 2600+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Athlon XP-M 2600+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3300
Celeron Dual-Core T3300
AMD Athlon XP-M 2600+
Athlon XP-M 2600+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 48 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Athlon XP-M 2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core T3300 or Athlon XP-M 2600+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.