HD Graphics 620 vs Celeron Dual-Core T3100

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T3100 and HD Graphics 620 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2663not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-CoreIntel HD Graphics
Power efficiency2.00no data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Gen9.5
Release date1 September 2009 (15 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core T3100 and HD Graphics 620 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)no data
Threads2no data
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz0.35 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache1 MBno data
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm0.014 μm 1.4e-5 mm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T3100 and HD Graphics 620 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA479, PGA478no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattno data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3100 and HD Graphics 620. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory sizeno data65,536 MB 67,108,864 KB 68,719,476,736 B 0.0625 TiB 64 GB

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm

HD Graphics 620 has a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron Dual-Core T3100 and HD Graphics 620. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T3100 and HD Graphics 620, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3100
Celeron Dual-Core T3100
Intel HD Graphics 620
HD Graphics 620

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 33 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 63 votes

Rate HD Graphics 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core T3100 or HD Graphics 620, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.