Core 2 Duo E8500 vs Celeron Dual-Core T3000

Aggregate performance score

Celeron Dual-Core T3000
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.43
Core 2 Duo E8500
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.80
+86%

Core 2 Duo E8500 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T3000 by an impressive 86% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Core 2 Duo E8500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29502596
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-Coreno data
Power efficiency1.161.16
Architecture codenamePenryn-1M (2009)Wolfdale (2008−2010)
Release date1 May 2009 (15 years ago)January 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Core 2 Duo E8500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data3.16 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz3.17 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz1333 MHz
L1 cache64 KB64 KB
L2 cache1 MB6 MB (shared)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size107 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors410 Million410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Core 2 Duo E8500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketP (478)LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Core 2 Duo E8500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Core 2 Duo E8500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Core 2 Duo E8500 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Core 2 Duo E8500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 0.43
Core 2 Duo E8500 0.80
+86%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 687
Core 2 Duo E8500 1278
+86%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.43 0.80
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 has 85.7% lower power consumption.

Core 2 Duo E8500, on the other hand, has a 86% higher aggregate performance score.

The Core 2 Duo E8500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core T3000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron Dual-Core T3000 is a notebook processor while Core 2 Duo E8500 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Core 2 Duo E8500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3000
Celeron Dual-Core T3000
Intel Core 2 Duo E8500
Core 2 Duo E8500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 61 vote

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 627 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E8500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core T3000 or Core 2 Duo E8500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.