Ryzen 7 2700 vs Celeron Dual-Core T1600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron Dual-Core T1600
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.61
Ryzen 7 2700
2018
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
10.15
+1564%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1600 by a whopping 1564% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and Ryzen 7 2700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2719729
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data18.85
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-CoreAMD Ryzen 7
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Zen+ (2018−2020)
Release date1 May 2008 (16 years ago)13 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and Ryzen 7 2700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speedno data3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.66 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus support667 MHz4 × 8 GT/s
L1 cacheno data768 KB
L2 cache1 MB4 MB
L3 cacheno data16 MB
Chip lithography65 nm12 nm
Die size143 mm2213 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors291 Million4800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and Ryzen 7 2700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPPGA478AM4 (1331)
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and Ryzen 7 2700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataSSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and Ryzen 7 2700 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and Ryzen 7 2700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data46.933 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and Ryzen 7 2700.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron Dual-Core T1600 0.61
Ryzen 7 2700 10.15
+1564%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1600 by 1564% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 65%

Celeron Dual-Core T1600 950
Ryzen 7 2700 15705
+1553%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1600 by 1553% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Celeron Dual-Core T1600 3000
Ryzen 7 2700 31385
+946%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1600 by 946% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Celeron Dual-Core T1600 1350
Ryzen 7 2700 9475
+602%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1600 by 602% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.61 10.15
Recency 1 May 2008 13 April 2018
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 65 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron Dual-Core T1600 has 85.7% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 2700, on the other hand, has a 1563.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 441.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 2700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core T1600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron Dual-Core T1600 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 2700 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and Ryzen 7 2700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1600
Celeron Dual-Core T1600
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Ryzen 7 2700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Error: Запрос select b.cpu_id from ss_cpu_benchmarks_results as b left join ss_cpu as i on i._id=b.cpu_id and i._disabled=0 and i.redirect_to=0 left join ss_cpu_custom as custom on custom.filename=i.filename and custom._disabled=0 left join ss_stat_exist as pop on pop.item_type="cpu" and pop.item1=i._id and pop.item2=746 and pop.lang="2" left join ss_stat_exist as pop2 on pop2.item_type="cpu" and pop2.item1=746 and pop2.item2=i._id and pop2.lang="2" where b.benchmark_id=-1 and i.type="mobile" and i.prof="0" and i._disabled=0 and ( if(pop.visits,pop.visits,pop2.visits)>=1 OR ( to_days(now()) - to_days(replace("2008-05-01","-00","-01"))<=366/2 OR to_days(now()) - to_days(replace(if(custom.date_of_announcement AND custom.date_of_announcement!="0000-01-00",custom.date_of_announcement,i.date_of_announcement),"-00","-01"))<=366/2 ) ) having !isnull(i._id) order by abs(0.61 - b.result) asc /* # 1 */ limit 6 вызвал ошибку Unknown column 'i._id' in 'having clause'

Array
(
    [0] => Array
        (
            [file] => /var/www/web/data/www/technical.city/system/lib/db.php
            [line] => 151
            [function] => db_query
            [args] => Array
                (
                    [0] => select b.cpu_id from ss_cpu_benchmarks_results as b
			left join ss_cpu as i
			on i._id=b.cpu_id and i._disabled=0 and i.redirect_to=0
			
			left join
			ss_cpu_custom as custom on custom.filename=i.filename and custom._disabled=0
			left join
			ss_stat_exist as pop
			on pop.item_type="cpu" and pop.item1=i._id and pop.item2=746 and pop.lang="2"
			left join
			ss_stat_exist as pop2
			on pop2.item_type="cpu" and pop2.item1=746 and pop2.item2=i._id and pop2.lang="2"
			
			where b.benchmark_id=-1 and i.type="mobile" and i.prof="0" and i._disabled=0
			and

			(
			if(pop.visits,pop.visits,pop2.visits)>=1
			OR
			(
			to_days(now()) - to_days(replace("2008-05-01","-00","-01"))<=366/2
			OR
			to_days(now()) - to_days(replace(if(custom.date_of_announcement AND custom.date_of_announcement!="0000-01-00",custom.date_of_announcement,i.date_of_announcement),"-00","-01"))<=366/2
			)
			)
			having !isnull(i._id)
			order by abs(0.61 - b.result) asc /* # 1 */ limit 6
                )

        )

    [1] => Array
        (
            [file] => /var/www/web/data/www/technical.city/_content/textblocks/text/85/85
            [line] => 150
            [function] => db_getItems
            [args] => Array
                (
                    [0] => select b.cpu_id from ss_cpu_benchmarks_results as b
			left join ss_cpu as i
			on i._id=b.cpu_id and i._disabled=0 and i.redirect_to=0
			
			left join
			ss_cpu_custom as custom on custom.filename=i.filename and custom._disabled=0
			left join
			ss_stat_exist as pop
			on pop.item_type="cpu" and pop.item1=i._id and pop.item2=746 and pop.lang="2"
			left join
			ss_stat_exist as pop2
			on pop2.item_type="cpu" and pop2.item1=746 and pop2.item2=i._id and pop2.lang="2"
			
			where b.benchmark_id=-1 and i.type="mobile" and i.prof="0" and i._disabled=0
			and

			(
			if(pop.visits,pop.visits,pop2.visits)>=1
			OR
			(
			to_days(now()) - to_days(replace("2008-05-01","-00","-01"))<=366/2
			OR
			to_days(now()) - to_days(replace(if(custom.date_of_announcement AND custom.date_of_announcement!="0000-01-00",custom.date_of_announcement,i.date_of_announcement),"-00","-01"))<=366/2
			)
			)
			having !isnull(i._id)
			order by abs(0.61 - b.result) asc /* # 1 */ limit 6
                )

        )

    [2] => Array
        (
            [file] => /var/www/web/data/www/technical.city/_content/textblocks/text/22/222
            [line] => 16525
            [function] => db_cache
            [args] => Array
                (
                    [0] => nearest_cpu_mobile_0_746_L2
                    [1] => db_getItems
                    [2] => select b.cpu_id from ss_cpu_benchmarks_results as b
			left join ss_cpu as i
			on i._id=b.cpu_id and i._disabled=0 and i.redirect_to=0
			
			left join
			ss_cpu_custom as custom on custom.filename=i.filename and custom._disabled=0
			left join
			ss_stat_exist as pop
			on pop.item_type="cpu" and pop.item1=i._id and pop.item2=746 and pop.lang="2"
			left join
			ss_stat_exist as pop2
			on pop2.item_type="cpu" and pop2.item1=746 and pop2.item2=i._id and pop2.lang="2"
			
			where b.benchmark_id=-1 and i.type="mobile" and i.prof="0" and i._disabled=0
			and

			(
			if(pop.visits,pop.visits,pop2.visits)>=1
			OR
			(
			to_days(now()) - to_days(replace("2008-05-01","-00","-01"))<=366/2
			OR
			to_days(now()) - to_days(replace(if(custom.date_of_announcement AND custom.date_of_announcement!="0000-01-00",custom.date_of_announcement,i.date_of_announcement),"-00","-01"))<=366/2
			)
			)
			having !isnull(i._id)
			order by abs(0.61 - b.result) asc /* # 1 */ limit 6
                    [3] => Array
                        (
                            [0] => ss_cpu_benchmarks_results
                            [1] => ss_cpu
                        )

                )

        )

    [3] => Array
        (
            [file] => /var/www/web/data/www/technical.city/_content/pages/text/24/324_1
            [line] => 15
            [args] => Array
                (
                    [0] => /var/www/web/data/www/technical.city/_content/textblocks/text/22/222
                )

            [function] => include
        )

    [4] => Array
        (
            [file] => /var/www/web/data/www/technical.city/system/handler/index.php
            [line] => 372
            [args] => Array
                (
                    [0] => /var/www/web/data/www/technical.city/_content/pages/text/24/324_1
                )

            [function] => require
        )

)

Error: Запрос select b.cpu_id from ss_cpu_benchmarks_results as b left join ss_cpu as i on i._id=b.cpu_id and i._disabled=0 and i.redirect_to=0 left join ss_cpu_custom as custom on custom.filename=i.filename and custom._disabled=0 left join ss_stat_exist as pop on pop.item_type="cpu" and pop.item1=i._id and pop.item2=2279 and pop.lang="2" left join ss_stat_exist as pop2 on pop2.item_type="cpu" and pop2.item1=2279 and pop2.item2=i._id and pop2.lang="2" where b.benchmark_id=-1 and i.type="mobile" and i.prof="0" and i._disabled=0 and ( if(pop.visits,pop.visits,pop2.visits)>=1 OR ( to_days(now()) - to_days(replace("2018-04-13","-00","-01"))<=366/2 OR to_days(now()) - to_days(replace(if(custom.date_of_announcement AND custom.date_of_announcement!="0000-01-00",custom.date_of_announcement,i.date_of_announcement),"-00","-01"))<=366/2 ) ) having !isnull(i._id) order by abs(10.15 - b.result) asc /* # 2 */ limit 6 вызвал ошибку Unknown column 'i._id' in 'having clause'

Array
(
    [0] => Array
        (
            [file] => /var/www/web/data/www/technical.city/system/lib/db.php
            [line] => 151
            [function] => db_query
            [args] => Array
                (
                    [0] => select b.cpu_id from ss_cpu_benchmarks_results as b
			left join ss_cpu as i
			on i._id=b.cpu_id and i._disabled=0 and i.redirect_to=0
			
			left join
			ss_cpu_custom as custom on custom.filename=i.filename and custom._disabled=0
			left join
			ss_stat_exist as pop
			on pop.item_type="cpu" and pop.item1=i._id and pop.item2=2279 and pop.lang="2"
			left join
			ss_stat_exist as pop2
			on pop2.item_type="cpu" and pop2.item1=2279 and pop2.item2=i._id and pop2.lang="2"
			
			where b.benchmark_id=-1 and i.type="mobile" and i.prof="0" and i._disabled=0
			and

			(
			if(pop.visits,pop.visits,pop2.visits)>=1
			OR
			(
			to_days(now()) - to_days(replace("2018-04-13","-00","-01"))<=366/2
			OR
			to_days(now()) - to_days(replace(if(custom.date_of_announcement AND custom.date_of_announcement!="0000-01-00",custom.date_of_announcement,i.date_of_announcement),"-00","-01"))<=366/2
			)
			)
			having !isnull(i._id)
			order by abs(10.15 - b.result) asc /* # 2 */ limit 6
                )

        )

    [1] => Array
        (
            [file] => /var/www/web/data/www/technical.city/_content/textblocks/text/85/85
            [line] => 150
            [function] => db_getItems
            [args] => Array
                (
                    [0] => select b.cpu_id from ss_cpu_benchmarks_results as b
			left join ss_cpu as i
			on i._id=b.cpu_id and i._disabled=0 and i.redirect_to=0
			
			left join
			ss_cpu_custom as custom on custom.filename=i.filename and custom._disabled=0
			left join
			ss_stat_exist as pop
			on pop.item_type="cpu" and pop.item1=i._id and pop.item2=2279 and pop.lang="2"
			left join
			ss_stat_exist as pop2
			on pop2.item_type="cpu" and pop2.item1=2279 and pop2.item2=i._id and pop2.lang="2"
			
			where b.benchmark_id=-1 and i.type="mobile" and i.prof="0" and i._disabled=0
			and

			(
			if(pop.visits,pop.visits,pop2.visits)>=1
			OR
			(
			to_days(now()) - to_days(replace("2018-04-13","-00","-01"))<=366/2
			OR
			to_days(now()) - to_days(replace(if(custom.date_of_announcement AND custom.date_of_announcement!="0000-01-00",custom.date_of_announcement,i.date_of_announcement),"-00","-01"))<=366/2
			)
			)
			having !isnull(i._id)
			order by abs(10.15 - b.result) asc /* # 2 */ limit 6
                )

        )

    [2] => Array
        (
            [file] => /var/www/web/data/www/technical.city/_content/textblocks/text/22/222
            [line] => 16525
            [function] => db_cache
            [args] => Array
                (
                    [0] => nearest_cpu_mobile_0_2279_L2
                    [1] => db_getItems
                    [2] => select b.cpu_id from ss_cpu_benchmarks_results as b
			left join ss_cpu as i
			on i._id=b.cpu_id and i._disabled=0 and i.redirect_to=0
			
			left join
			ss_cpu_custom as custom on custom.filename=i.filename and custom._disabled=0
			left join
			ss_stat_exist as pop
			on pop.item_type="cpu" and pop.item1=i._id and pop.item2=2279 and pop.lang="2"
			left join
			ss_stat_exist as pop2
			on pop2.item_type="cpu" and pop2.item1=2279 and pop2.item2=i._id and pop2.lang="2"
			
			where b.benchmark_id=-1 and i.type="mobile" and i.prof="0" and i._disabled=0
			and

			(
			if(pop.visits,pop.visits,pop2.visits)>=1
			OR
			(
			to_days(now()) - to_days(replace("2018-04-13","-00","-01"))<=366/2
			OR
			to_days(now()) - to_days(replace(if(custom.date_of_announcement AND custom.date_of_announcement!="0000-01-00",custom.date_of_announcement,i.date_of_announcement),"-00","-01"))<=366/2
			)
			)
			having !isnull(i._id)
			order by abs(10.15 - b.result) asc /* # 2 */ limit 6
                    [3] => Array
                        (
                            [0] => ss_cpu_benchmarks_results
                            [1] => ss_cpu
                        )

                )

        )

    [3] => Array
        (
            [file] => /var/www/web/data/www/technical.city/_content/pages/text/24/324_1
            [line] => 15
            [args] => Array
                (
                    [0] => /var/www/web/data/www/technical.city/_content/textblocks/text/22/222
                )

            [function] => include
        )

    [4] => Array
        (
            [file] => /var/www/web/data/www/technical.city/system/handler/index.php
            [line] => 372
            [args] => Array
                (
                    [0] => /var/www/web/data/www/technical.city/_content/pages/text/24/324_1
                )

            [function] => require
        )

)

Error: Запрос select b.cpu_id from ss_cpu_benchmarks_results as b left join ss_cpu as i on i._id=b.cpu_id and i._disabled=0 and i.redirect_to=0 left join ss_cpu_custom as custom on custom.filename=i.filename and custom._disabled=0 left join ss_stat_exist as pop on pop.item_type="cpu" and pop.item1=i._id and pop.item2=746 and pop.lang="2" left join ss_stat_exist as pop2 on pop2.item_type="cpu" and pop2.item1=746 and pop2.item2=i._id and pop2.lang="2" where b.benchmark_id=-1 and i.type="mobile" and i.prof="0" and i._disabled=0 and ( if(pop.visits,pop.visits,pop2.visits)>=1 OR ( to_days(now()) - to_days(replace("2008-05-01","-00","-01"))<=366/2 OR to_days(now()) - to_days(replace(if(custom.date_of_announcement AND custom.date_of_announcement!="0000-01-00",custom.date_of_announcement,i.date_of_announcement),"-00","-01"))<=366/2 ) ) having !isnull(i._id) order by abs(0.61 - b.result) asc /* # 1 */ limit 6 вызвал ошибку Unknown column 'i._id' in 'having clause'

Array
(
    [0] => Array
        (
            [file] => /var/www/web/data/www/technical.city/system/lib/db.php
            [line] => 151
            [function] => db_query
            [args] => Array
                (
                    [0] => select b.cpu_id from ss_cpu_benchmarks_results as b
			left join ss_cpu as i
			on i._id=b.cpu_id and i._disabled=0 and i.redirect_to=0
			
			left join
			ss_cpu_custom as custom on custom.filename=i.filename and custom._disabled=0
			left join
			ss_stat_exist as pop
			on pop.item_type="cpu" and pop.item1=i._id and pop.item2=746 and pop.lang="2"
			left join
			ss_stat_exist as pop2
			on pop2.item_type="cpu" and pop2.item1=746 and pop2.item2=i._id and pop2.lang="2"
			
			where b.benchmark_id=-1 and i.type="mobile" and i.prof="0" and i._disabled=0
			and

			(
			if(pop.visits,pop.visits,pop2.visits)>=1
			OR
			(
			to_days(now()) - to_days(replace("2008-05-01","-00","-01"))<=366/2
			OR
			to_days(now()) - to_days(replace(if(custom.date_of_announcement AND custom.date_of_announcement!="0000-01-00",custom.date_of_announcement,i.date_of_announcement),"-00","-01"))<=366/2
			)
			)
			having !isnull(i._id)
			order by abs(0.61 - b.result) asc /* # 1 */ limit 6
                )

        )

    [1] => Array
        (
            [file] => /var/www/web/data/www/technical.city/_content/textblocks/text/85/85
            [line] => 150
            [function] => db_getItems
            [args] => Array
                (
                    [0] => select b.cpu_id from ss_cpu_benchmarks_results as b
			left join ss_cpu as i
			on i._id=b.cpu_id and i._disabled=0 and i.redirect_to=0
			
			left join
			ss_cpu_custom as custom on custom.filename=i.filename and custom._disabled=0
			left join
			ss_stat_exist as pop
			on pop.item_type="cpu" and pop.item1=i._id and pop.item2=746 and pop.lang="2"
			left join
			ss_stat_exist as pop2
			on pop2.item_type="cpu" and pop2.item1=746 and pop2.item2=i._id and pop2.lang="2"
			
			where b.benchmark_id=-1 and i.type="mobile" and i.prof="0" and i._disabled=0
			and

			(
			if(pop.visits,pop.visits,pop2.visits)>=1
			OR
			(
			to_days(now()) - to_days(replace("2008-05-01","-00","-01"))<=366/2
			OR
			to_days(now()) - to_days(replace(if(custom.date_of_announcement AND custom.date_of_announcement!="0000-01-00",custom.date_of_announcement,i.date_of_announcement),"-00","-01"))<=366/2
			)
			)
			having !isnull(i._id)
			order by abs(0.61 - b.result) asc /* # 1 */ limit 6
                )

        )

    [2] => Array
        (
            [file] => /var/www/web/data/www/technical.city/_content/textblocks/text/22/222
            [line] => 16525
            [function] => db_cache
            [args] => Array
                (
                    [0] => nearest_cpu_mobile_0_746_L2
                    [1] => db_getItems
                    [2] => select b.cpu_id from ss_cpu_benchmarks_results as b
			left join ss_cpu as i
			on i._id=b.cpu_id and i._disabled=0 and i.redirect_to=0
			
			left join
			ss_cpu_custom as custom on custom.filename=i.filename and custom._disabled=0
			left join
			ss_stat_exist as pop
			on pop.item_type="cpu" and pop.item1=i._id and pop.item2=746 and pop.lang="2"
			left join
			ss_stat_exist as pop2
			on pop2.item_type="cpu" and pop2.item1=746 and pop2.item2=i._id and pop2.lang="2"
			
			where b.benchmark_id=-1 and i.type="mobile" and i.prof="0" and i._disabled=0
			and

			(
			if(pop.visits,pop.visits,pop2.visits)>=1
			OR
			(
			to_days(now()) - to_days(replace("2008-05-01","-00","-01"))<=366/2
			OR
			to_days(now()) - to_days(replace(if(custom.date_of_announcement AND custom.date_of_announcement!="0000-01-00",custom.date_of_announcement,i.date_of_announcement),"-00","-01"))<=366/2
			)
			)
			having !isnull(i._id)
			order by abs(0.61 - b.result) asc /* # 1 */ limit 6
                    [3] => Array
                        (
                            [0] => ss_cpu_benchmarks_results
                            [1] => ss_cpu
                        )

                )

        )

    [3] => Array
        (
            [file] => /var/www/web/data/www/technical.city/_content/pages/text/24/324_1
            [line] => 15
            [args] => Array
                (
                    [0] => /var/www/web/data/www/technical.city/_content/textblocks/text/22/222
                )

            [function] => include
        )

    [4] => Array
        (
            [file] => /var/www/web/data/www/technical.city/system/handler/index.php
            [line] => 372
            [args] => Array
                (
                    [0] => /var/www/web/data/www/technical.city/_content/pages/text/24/324_1
                )

            [function] => require
        )

)

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 11 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 2955 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 2700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core T1600 or Ryzen 7 2700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.