Ryzen 7 6800H vs Celeron Dual-Core T1400

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron Dual-Core T1400
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.43
Ryzen 7 6800H
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
14.72
+3323%

Ryzen 7 6800H outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1400 by a whopping 3323% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Ryzen 7 6800H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2974481
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-CoreAMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)
Power efficiency1.1630.94
Architecture codenameMerom-2M (2008)Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022)
Release date1 May 2008 (16 years ago)January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Ryzen 7 6800H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speedno data3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.73 GHz4.7 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm6 nm
Die sizeno data208 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Ryzen 7 6800H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPFP7
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Ryzen 7 6800H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Ryzen 7 6800H are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Ryzen 7 6800H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 680M ( - 2200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Ryzen 7 6800H.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron Dual-Core T1400 0.43
Ryzen 7 6800H 14.72
+3323%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Celeron Dual-Core T1400 2725
Ryzen 7 6800H 39319
+1343%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Celeron Dual-Core T1400 47
Ryzen 7 6800H 8.22
+472%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.43 14.72
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 65 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 45 Watt

Celeron Dual-Core T1400 has 28.6% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 6800H, on the other hand, has a 3323.3% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 983.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 6800H is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Ryzen 7 6800H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1400
Celeron Dual-Core T1400
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
Ryzen 7 6800H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 285 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1523 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 6800H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core T1400 or Ryzen 7 6800H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.