Core Duo T2250 vs Celeron Dual-Core T1400
Primary details
Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Core Duo T2250 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron Dual-Core | Core Duo |
| Architecture codename | Merom-2M (2008) | Yonah (2005−2006) |
| Release date | 1 May 2008 (16 years ago) | May 2006 (18 years ago) |
| Current price | no data | $19.69 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Core Duo T2250 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.73 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.73 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
| Bus support | 533 MHz | 533 MHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | no data | 90 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 151 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
| VID voltage range | no data | 0.7625-1.3V |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Core Duo T2250 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | P | PPGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 31 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Core Duo T2250. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
| Status | no data | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Core Duo T2250 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Core Duo T2250 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Core Duo T2250. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR1 |
| ECC memory support | no data | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Core Duo T2250 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1400 by 6% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.
Pros & cons summary
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 31 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Core Duo T2250. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Core Duo T2250, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
