3020e vs Celeron Dual-Core T1400

Place in the ranking	2974	2137
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Intel Celeron Dual-Core	AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Power efficiency	1.16	24.12
Architecture codename	Merom-2M (2008)	Dali (Zen) (2020)
Release date	1 May 2008 (16 years ago)	4 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and 3020e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	2	2
Base clock speed	no data	1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed	1.73 GHz	2.6 GHz
Bus rate	533 MHz	no data
L1 cache	no data	192 KB
L2 cache	512 KB	1 MB
L3 cache	no data	4 MB
Chip lithography	65 nm	14 nm
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	105 °C
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and 3020e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket	P	FT5
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and 3020e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI	-	+
FMA	-	+
AVX	-	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and 3020e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

no data

DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron Dual-Core T1400 0.43

3020e 1.53
+256%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Celeron Dual-Core T1400 47

3020e 29
+62.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.43	1.53
Recency	1 May 2008	4 August 2020
Chip lithography	65 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	6 Watt

3020e has a 255.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 483.3% lower power consumption.

The 3020e is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and 3020e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.