Turion 64 MT-28 vs Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
Aggregate performance score
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 outperforms Turion 64 MT-28 by an impressive 71% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Turion 64 MT-28 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3126 | 3275 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron Dual-Core | Turion 64 |
| Power efficiency | 2.75 | 0.64 |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Lancaster (2005−2006) |
| Release date | 1 September 2009 (15 years ago) | June 2005 (19 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $134 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Turion 64 MT-28 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 125 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | 114 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Turion 64 MT-28 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA956 | 754 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Turion 64 MT-28. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| PowerNow | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.29 | 0.17 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 25 Watt |
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 has a 70.6% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.
The Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 MT-28 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Turion 64 MT-28, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
