Pentium Dual T3200 vs Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
Aggregate performance score
Pentium Dual Core T3200 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 by a considerable 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3405 | 3267 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.01 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron Dual-Core | Intel Pentium Dual Core |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| Release date | 1 September 2009 (16 years ago) | 1 October 2008 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $134 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Pentium Dual Core T3200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 667 MHz |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 143 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | 291 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Pentium Dual Core T3200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | BGA956 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Pentium Dual Core T3200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.26 | 0.38 |
| Recency | 1 September 2009 | 1 October 2008 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 has an age advantage of 11 months, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.
Pentium Dual T3200, on the other hand, has a 46.2% higher aggregate performance score.
The Intel Pentium Dual Core T3200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
