Mobile Sempron 3300+ vs Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.30
+57.9%
Mobile Sempron 3300+
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 62 Watt
0.19

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 outperforms Mobile Sempron 3300+ by an impressive 58% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Mobile Sempron 3300+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31113256
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-CoreAMD Mobile Sempron
Power efficiency2.840.29
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Roma (2005)
Release date1 September 2009 (15 years ago)1 June 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$134no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Mobile Sempron 3300+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz800 MHz
L2 cache1 MB128 KB
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Mobile Sempron 3300+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA956745
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt62/25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Mobile Sempron 3300+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 (Roma Core), Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 0.30
+57.9%
Mobile Sempron 3300+ 0.19

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 482
+63.9%
Mobile Sempron 3300+ 294

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.30 0.19
Recency 1 September 2009 1 June 2005
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 62 Watt

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 has a 57.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 520% lower power consumption.

The Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Sempron 3300+ in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Mobile Sempron 3300+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
AMD Mobile Sempron 3300+
Mobile Sempron 3300+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 7 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobile Sempron 3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 or Mobile Sempron 3300+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.