EPYC Embedded 3351 vs Celeron D 352

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron D 352 and EPYC Embedded 3351 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3275not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC Embedded
Power efficiency0.19no data
Architecture codenameCedar Mill (2006)Zen (2017−2020)
Release dateMay 2006 (18 years ago)21 February 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron D 352 and EPYC Embedded 3351 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads124
Base clock speed3.2 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3 GHz
Multiplierno data19
L1 cache16 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Die size109 mm22x 213 mm2
Maximum core temperature69 °Cno data
Number of transistors125 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.25V-1.325Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron D 352 and EPYC Embedded 3351 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPLGA775AMD BGA SP4r2
Power consumption (TDP)86 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron D 352 and EPYC Embedded 3351. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron D 352 and EPYC Embedded 3351 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron D 352 and EPYC Embedded 3351 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron D 352 and EPYC Embedded 3351. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4-2666
Maximum memory sizeno data1 TiB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data85.33 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron D 352 and EPYC Embedded 3351.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 12
Threads 1 24
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 86 Watt 80 Watt

EPYC Embedded 3351 has 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 7.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron D 352 and EPYC Embedded 3351. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron D 352 is a desktop processor while EPYC Embedded 3351 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron D 352 and EPYC Embedded 3351, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron D 352
Celeron D 352
AMD EPYC Embedded 3351
EPYC Embedded 3351

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 35 votes

Rate Celeron D 352 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC Embedded 3351 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron D 352 or EPYC Embedded 3351, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.