Mobile Pentium 4 520 vs Celeron D 326

Primary details

Comparing Celeron D 326 and Mobile Pentium 4 520 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataMobile Pentium 4
Architecture codenamePrescott (2001−2005)Northwood (2002−2004)
Release dateSeptember 2004 (20 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron D 326 and Mobile Pentium 4 520 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speed2.53 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.53 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus rateno data533 MHz
L1 cache16 KBno data
L2 cache256 KBno data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography90 nm90 nm
Die size109 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature68 °Cno data
Number of transistors125 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.25V-1.4Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron D 326 and Mobile Pentium 4 520 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketPLGA478,PLGA775no data
Power consumption (TDP)84 Watt91 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron D 326 and Mobile Pentium 4 520. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron D 326 and Mobile Pentium 4 520 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron D 326 and Mobile Pentium 4 520 are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron D 326 and Mobile Pentium 4 520. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3no data

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 84 Watt 91 Watt

Celeron D 326 has 8.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron D 326 and Mobile Pentium 4 520. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron D 326 is a desktop processor while Mobile Pentium 4 520 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron D 326 and Mobile Pentium 4 520, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron D 326
Celeron D 326
Intel Mobile Pentium 4 520
Mobile Pentium 4 520

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 82 votes

Rate Celeron D 326 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 7 votes

Rate Mobile Pentium 4 520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron D 326 or Mobile Pentium 4 520, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.