Pentium Dual T4500 vs Celeron B840

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron B840
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.61
Pentium Dual Core T4500
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.84
+37.7%

Pentium Dual Core T4500 outperforms Celeron B840 by a substantial 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron B840 and Pentium Dual Core T4500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27872568
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Pentium Dual Core
Power efficiency1.652.27
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date1 July 2011 (13 years ago)1 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron B840 and Pentium Dual Core T4500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.9 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/s800 MHz
Multiplier19no data
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size131 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 million410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron B840 and Pentium Dual Core T4500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCPGA988,PGA988P
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron B840 and Pentium Dual Core T4500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

FMA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron B840 and Pentium Dual Core T4500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron B840 and Pentium Dual Core T4500 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron B840 and Pentium Dual Core T4500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron B840 and Pentium Dual Core T4500 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron B840 and Pentium Dual Core T4500.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron B840 0.61
Pentium Dual T4500 0.84
+37.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron B840 967
Pentium Dual T4500 1336
+38.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.61 0.84
Recency 1 July 2011 1 January 2010
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm

Celeron B840 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Pentium Dual T4500, on the other hand, has a 37.7% higher aggregate performance score.

The Pentium Dual Core T4500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron B840 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron B840 and Pentium Dual Core T4500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron B840
Celeron B840
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500
Pentium Dual Core T4500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.9 17 votes

Rate Celeron B840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 423 votes

Rate Pentium Dual Core T4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron B840 or Pentium Dual Core T4500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.