FX-4150 vs Celeron B730
Aggregate performance score
FX-4150 outperforms Celeron B730 by a whopping 478% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron B730 and FX-4150 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3046 | 1887 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.98 | 2.08 |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Zambezi (2011−2012) |
| Release date | 1 July 2012 (12 years ago) | 23 October 2012 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $70 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron B730 and FX-4150 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 2.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 5 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 18 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 1.5 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 131 mm2 | 315 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 504 million | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron B730 and FX-4150 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | G2 (988B) | AM3+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron B730 and FX-4150. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | + | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Security technologies
Celeron B730 and FX-4150 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron B730 and FX-4150 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron B730 and FX-4150. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.335 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (650 - 1000 MHz) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron B730 and FX-4150.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.36 | 2.08 |
| Recency | 1 July 2012 | 23 October 2012 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 95 Watt |
Celeron B730 has 171.4% lower power consumption.
FX-4150, on the other hand, has a 477.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, and 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
The FX-4150 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron B730 in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron B730 is a notebook processor while FX-4150 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron B730 and FX-4150, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
