i3-L13G4 vs Celeron 925

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 925
2011
35 Watt
0.30
Core i3-L13G4
2020
5 cores / 5 threads, 7 Watt
1.75
+483%

Core i3-L13G4 outperforms Celeron 925 by a whopping 483% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 925 and Core i3-L13G4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31152036
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Ice Lake
Power efficiency0.8123.66
Architecture codenameno dataLakefield (2020)
Release date1 January 2011 (13 years ago)June 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$281

Detailed specifications

Celeron 925 and Core i3-L13G4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data5 (Penta-Core)
Threadsno data5
Base clock speed2.3 GHz0.8 GHz
Boost clock speedno data2.8 GHz
Bus rateno data4 GT/s
L1 cacheno data80 KB
L2 cacheno data512 KB
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm
Die sizeno data82 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data4,050 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 925 and Core i3-L13G4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFC-CSP1016
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt7 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 925 and Core i3-L13G4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology--
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+

Security technologies

Celeron 925 and Core i3-L13G4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 925 and Core i3-L13G4 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 925 and Core i3-L13G4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data500 MHz
Execution Unitsno data48

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 925 and Core i3-L13G4 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 925 and Core i3-L13G4 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 925 and Core i3-L13G4 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDX12
OpenGLno dataOpenGL4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 925 and Core i3-L13G4.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data6

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.30 1.75
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 7 Watt

i3-L13G4 has a 483.3% higher aggregate performance score, a 350% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-L13G4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 925 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 925 and Core i3-L13G4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 925
Celeron 925
Intel Core i3-L13G4
Core i3-L13G4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 925 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 5 votes

Rate Core i3-L13G4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 925 or Core i3-L13G4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.