Celeron 2.8 GHz vs 925

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3443not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Power efficiency0.31no data
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameno dataNorthwood (2002−2004)
Release date1 January 2011 (15 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 925 and Celeron 2.8 GHz basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data1 (Single-Core)
Threadsno data1
Base clock speed2.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2.8 GHz
Bus rateno data400 MHz
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography45 nm130 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 925 and Celeron 2.8 GHz compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt52.8 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 925 and Celeron 2.8 GHz. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data

Security technologies

Celeron 925 and Celeron 2.8 GHz technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 925 and Celeron 2.8 GHz are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 45 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 52 Watt

Celeron 925 has a 188.9% more advanced lithography process, and 48.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron 925 and Intel Celeron 2.8 GHz. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 925
Celeron 925
Intel Celeron 2.8 GHz
Celeron 2.8 GHz

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Celeron 925 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 53 votes

Rate Celeron 2.8 GHz on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron 925 and Celeron 2.8 GHz, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.