Atom Z500 vs Celeron 925

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 925
2011
35 Watt
0.26
+85.7%

Celeron 925 outperforms Atom Z500 by an impressive 86% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking34413616
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiency0.319.10
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameno dataSilverthorne (2008−2010)
Release date1 January 2011 (15 years ago)2 April 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$45

Detailed specifications

Celeron 925 and Atom Z500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data1 (Single-Core)
Threadsno data1
Base clock speed2.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speedno data0.8 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data400 MT/s
Multiplierno data8
L1 cacheno data56 KB
L2 cacheno data512 KB
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data24.18 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C90 °C
Number of transistorsno data47 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.80 -1.1V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 925 and Atom Z500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
Socketno dataPBGA441
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt0.65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 925 and Atom Z500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Celeron 925 and Atom Z500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 925 and Atom Z500 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x--

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.26 0.14
Recency 1 January 2011 2 April 2008

Celeron 925 has a 85.7% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 years.

The Intel Celeron 925 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom Z500 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 925
Celeron 925
Intel Atom Z500
Atom Z500

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Celeron 925 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 37 votes

Rate Atom Z500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron 925 and Atom Z500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.