Core i9-13900K vs Celeron 900
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 900 and Core i9-13900K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 74 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 62.86 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | Intel Core i9 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) |
| Release date | 1 January 2009 (15 years ago) | 27 September 2022 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $589 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron 900 and Core i9-13900K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 32 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 5.8 GHz |
| Bus support | no data | 4 × 16 GT/s |
| L1 cache | no data | 1.5 MB |
| L2 cache | no data | 16 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 12 MB |
| Chip lithography | no data | Intel 7 nm |
| Die size | no data | 257 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 900 and Core i9-13900K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | LGA 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 125 W, 253 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 900 and Core i9-13900K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 900 and Core i9-13900K are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 900 and Core i9-13900K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4, DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 89.604 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | no data | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 900 and Core i9-13900K.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 January 2009 | 27 September 2022 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 125 Watt |
Celeron 900 has 257.1% lower power consumption.
i9-13900K, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 900 and Core i9-13900K. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron 900 is a notebook processor while Core i9-13900K is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 900 and Core i9-13900K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
