EPYC 7713P vs Celeron 887

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 887 and EPYC 7713P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated27
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data14.74
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Milan (2021)
Release date1 September 2012 (11 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86$5,010
Current price$300 (3.5x MSRP)$3229 (0.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 887 and EPYC 7713P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads2128
Base clock speed1.5 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz3.68 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm+
Die size131 mm28x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 887 and EPYC 7713P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1023SP3
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 887 and EPYC 7713P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
FMA+no data
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Celeron 887 and EPYC 7713P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 887 and EPYC 7713P are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 887 and EPYC 7713P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size16 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.3 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® ProcessorsN/A
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 887 and EPYC 7713P integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 887 and EPYC 7713P.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron 887 754
EPYC 7713P 80975
+10639%

EPYC 7713P outperforms Celeron 887 by 10639% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2012 15 March 2021
Physical cores 2 64
Threads 2 128
Cost $86 $5010
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 225 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron 887 and EPYC 7713P. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron 887 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7713P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 887 and EPYC 7713P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 887
Celeron 887
AMD EPYC 7713P
EPYC 7713P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 14 votes

Rate Celeron 887 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 5 votes

Rate EPYC 7713P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 887 or EPYC 7713P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.