Core 2 Duo L7500 vs Celeron 847E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 847E
0, $111
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.33
Core 2 Duo L7500
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.38
+15.2%

Core 2 Duo L7500 outperforms Celeron 847E by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33323279
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronCore 2 Duo
Power efficiency2.09no data
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Merom (2006−2008)
Release dateno datano data
Launch price (MSRP)$111no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Celeron 847E and Core 2 Duo L7500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.1 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/s800 MHz
Multiplier11no data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KBno data
L3 cache2 MB4 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size131 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors504 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.975V - 1.062V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 847E and Core 2 Duo L7500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
Socketno dataPBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 847E and Core 2 Duo L7500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

FMA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Celeron 847E and Core 2 Duo L7500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 847E and Core 2 Duo L7500 are enumerated here.

VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 847E and Core 2 Duo L7500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1333no data
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Celeron 847E 0.33
Core 2 Duo L7500 0.38
+15.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Celeron 847E 584
Samples: 18
Core 2 Duo L7500 663
+13.5%
Samples: 94

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron 847E 190
Core 2 Duo L7500 225
+18.4%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron 847E 338
Core 2 Duo L7500 376
+11.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.33 0.38
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm

Celeron 847E has a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

Core 2 Duo L7500, on the other hand, has a 15.2% higher aggregate performance score.

The Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron 847E in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 847E
Celeron 847E
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500
Core 2 Duo L7500

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Celeron 847E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 14 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo L7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron 847E and Core 2 Duo L7500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.