UHD Graphics 605 vs Celeron 847E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3328not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel UHD Graphics
Power efficiency2.08no data
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Gen9.5
Release dateno datano data
Launch price (MSRP)$111no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Celeron 847E and UHD Graphics 605 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)no data
Threads2no data
Boost clock speed1.1 GHz0.25 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier11no data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KBno data
L3 cache2 MBno data
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm0.014 μm 1.4e-5 mm
Die size131 mm2no data
Number of transistors504 Millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 847E and UHD Graphics 605 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
Power consumption (TDP)17 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 847E and UHD Graphics 605. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

FMA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 847E and UHD Graphics 605 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 847E and UHD Graphics 605. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1333no data
Maximum memory size16 GB8,192 MB 8,388,608 KB 8,589,934,592 B 0.00781 TiB 8 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)no data

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm

UHD Graphics 605 has a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron 847E and Intel UHD Graphics 605. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 847E
Celeron 847E
Intel UHD Graphics 605
UHD Graphics 605

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Celeron 847E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 37 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 605 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron 847E and UHD Graphics 605, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.