Aubrey Isle vs Celeron 847E

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 847E and Aubrey Isle processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3030not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency2.06no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Knights Ferry (2010)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)31 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$111no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 847E and Aubrey Isle basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads2128
Boost clock speed1.1 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier11no data
L1 cache128 KB32 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB0 KB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size131 mm2684 mm2
Number of transistors504 Million2,300 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 847E and Aubrey Isle compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socketno dataPCIe x16
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt300 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 847E and Aubrey Isle. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

FMA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 847E and Aubrey Isle are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 847E and Aubrey Isle. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1333DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 32
Threads 2 128
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 300 Watt

Celeron 847E has a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 1664.7% lower power consumption.

Aubrey Isle, on the other hand, has 1500% more physical cores and 6300% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 847E and Aubrey Isle. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron 847E is a notebook processor while Aubrey Isle is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 847E and Aubrey Isle, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 847E
Celeron 847E
Intel Aubrey Isle
Aubrey Isle

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Celeron 847E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Aubrey Isle on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 847E or Aubrey Isle, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.