Xeon Platinum 8170 vs Celeron 847

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3409not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Xeon Platinum
Power efficiency0.72no data
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
Release date19 June 2011 (14 years ago)25 April 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$134$7,405

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Celeron 847 and Xeon Platinum 8170 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)26 (Hexacosa-Core)
Threads252
Base clock speed1.1 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.1 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier1121
L1 cache64K (per core)1.625 MB
L2 cache256K (per core)26 MB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)35.75 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size131 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C89 °C
Number of transistors504 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 847 and Xeon Platinum 8170 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)8 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1023FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 847 and Xeon Platinum 8170. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron 847 and Xeon Platinum 8170 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 847 and Xeon Platinum 8170 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 847 and Xeon Platinum 8170. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size16 GB768 GB
Max memory channels26
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s128.001 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (350 - 800 MHz)no data
Graphics max frequency800 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 847 and Xeon Platinum 8170 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 847 and Xeon Platinum 8170.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1648

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 June 2011 25 April 2017
Physical cores 2 26
Threads 2 52
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 165 Watt

Celeron 847 has 870.6% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8170, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, 1200% more physical cores and 2500% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron 847 and Intel Xeon Platinum 8170. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron 847 is a notebook processor while Xeon Platinum 8170 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 847
Celeron 847
Intel Xeon Platinum 8170
Xeon Platinum 8170

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 422 votes

Rate Celeron 847 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Platinum 8170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron 847 and Xeon Platinum 8170, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.