Pentium Dual T2080 vs Celeron 847

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 847
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.30
+42.9%
Pentium Dual Core T2080
2 cores / 2 threads, 31 Watt
0.21

Celeron 847 outperforms Pentium Dual Core T2080 by a considerable 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 847 and Pentium Dual Core T2080 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30983195
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronPentium Dual Core
Power efficiency1.670.64
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Yonah (2005−2006)
Release date19 June 2011 (13 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$134no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 847 and Pentium Dual Core T2080 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.1 GHz1.73 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/s533 MHz
Multiplier11no data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)no data
L3 cache2 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size131 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 847 and Pentium Dual Core T2080 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCBGA1023no data
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt31 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 847 and Pentium Dual Core T2080. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
FMA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron 847 and Pentium Dual Core T2080 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 847 and Pentium Dual Core T2080 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 847 and Pentium Dual Core T2080. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (350 - 800 MHz)no data
Graphics max frequency800 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 847 and Pentium Dual Core T2080 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 847 and Pentium Dual Core T2080.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 847 0.30
+42.9%
Pentium Dual T2080 0.21

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 847 478
+40.2%
Pentium Dual T2080 341

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.30 0.21
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 31 Watt

Celeron 847 has a 42.9% higher aggregate performance score, a 103.1% more advanced lithography process, and 82.4% lower power consumption.

The Celeron 847 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium Dual Core T2080 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 847 and Pentium Dual Core T2080, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 847
Celeron 847
Intel Pentium Dual Core T2080
Pentium Dual Core T2080

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 384 votes

Rate Celeron 847 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 24 votes

Rate Pentium Dual Core T2080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 847 or Pentium Dual Core T2080, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.