Ultra 7 355 vs Celeron 847

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 847
2011, $134
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.29
Core Ultra 7 355
8 cores / 8 threads, 25 Watt
11.42
+3838%

Core Ultra 7 355 outperforms Celeron 847 by a whopping 3838% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3407809
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency0.7219.29
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Panther Lake (2026)
Release date19 June 2011 (14 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$134no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Celeron 847 and Core Ultra 7 355 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Performance-coresno data4
Low Power Efficient-coresno data4
Threads28
Base clock speed1.1 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.1 GHz4.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier11no data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)no data
L3 cache2 MB (shared)12 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Chip lithography32 nmno data
Die size131 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 847 and Core Ultra 7 355 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCBGA1023FCBGA2540
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 847 and Core Ultra 7 355. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Celeron 847 and Core Ultra 7 355 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 847 and Core Ultra 7 355 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 847 and Core Ultra 7 355. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3LPDDR5X-7467, DDR5-6400
Maximum memory size16 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (350 - 800 MHz)Intel® Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequency800 MHz2.5 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 847 and Core Ultra 7 355 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported24
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 847 and Core Ultra 7 355 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over eDPno data3840 x 2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 847 and Core Ultra 7 355 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX 12 Ultimate
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 847 and Core Ultra 7 355.

PCIe version2.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes1612

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Celeron 847 0.29
Ultra 7 355 11.42
+3838%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Celeron 847 509
Samples: 477
Ultra 7 355 20007
+3831%
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.29 11.42
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 25 Watt

Celeron 847 has 47.1% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 355, on the other hand, has a 3837.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

The Intel Core Ultra 7 355 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron 847 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 847
Celeron 847
Intel Core Ultra 7 355
Core Ultra 7 355

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 422 votes

Rate Celeron 847 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 355 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron 847 and Core Ultra 7 355, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.