Atom Z2460 vs Celeron 847
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3385 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.01 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.72 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Penwell (2012−2013) |
| Release date | 19 June 2011 (14 years ago) | 1 January 2012 (13 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $134 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Celeron 847 and Atom Z2460 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 2.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 5 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 11 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 131 mm2 | 65 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 90 °C |
| Number of transistors | 504 million | 140 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 847 and Atom Z2460 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA1023 | FC-MB4617 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 3 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 847 and Atom Z2460. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE, Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3 |
| FMA | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
| Idle States | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| GPIO | no data | 152 |
| FDI | + | no data |
| Fast Memory Access | + | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron 847 and Atom Z2460 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 847 and Atom Z2460 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 847 and Atom Z2460. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR2 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | 2 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.335 GB/s | 6.4 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (350 - 800 MHz) | PowerVR SGX540 (400 MHz) |
| Graphics max frequency | 800 MHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 847 and Atom Z2460 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 2 | 2 |
| eDP | + | no data |
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | + |
| SDVO | + | no data |
| CRT | + | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 847 and Atom Z2460.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
| USB revision | no data | 2.0 OTG |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 1 |
| UART | no data | 3 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Geekbench 2
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 19 June 2011 | 1 January 2012 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 3 Watt |
Celeron 847 has 100% more physical cores.
Atom Z2460, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, and 466.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron 847 and Intel Atom Z2460. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
