Ryzen 3 4300G vs Celeron 827E
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 3 4300G outperforms Celeron 827E by a whopping 2581% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3407 | 1255 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron | AMD Ryzen 3 |
| Power efficiency | 0.52 | 3.66 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| Release date | no data | 21 July 2020 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $89 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 827E and Ryzen 3 4300G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 2.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 5 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 14 | 38 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 1.5 MB | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 131 mm2 | 156 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 504 Million | 9,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 827E and Ryzen 3 4300G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | no data | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 827E and Ryzen 3 4300G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 827E and Ryzen 3 4300G are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 827E and Ryzen 3 4300G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1066 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.335 GB/s | 51.196 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | AMD Radeon Vega 6 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 827E and Ryzen 3 4300G.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.21 | 5.63 |
| Integrated graphics card | 0.33 | 2.80 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 65 Watt |
Celeron 827E has 282.4% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 3 4300G, on the other hand, has a 2581% higher aggregate performance score, 748.5% faster integrated GPU, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD Ryzen 3 4300G is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron 827E in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron 827E is a notebook processor while Ryzen 3 4300G is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
