Athlon XP 2500+ vs Celeron 827E

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 827E
1 core / 1 thread, 17 Watt
0.23
+53.3%
Athlon XP 2500+
2003
1 core / 1 thread, 68 Watt
0.15

Celeron 827E outperforms Athlon XP 2500+ by an impressive 53% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 827E and Athlon XP 2500+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31853327
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency1.280.21
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Barton (2001−2004)
Release dateno dataFebruary 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$89no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 827E and Athlon XP 2500+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz1.83 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier14no data
L1 cache64 KB128 KB
L2 cache256 KB512 KB
L3 cache1.5 MB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm130 nm
Die size131 mm2101 mm2
Number of transistors504 Million63 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 827E and Athlon XP 2500+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socketno dataA
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt68 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 827E and Athlon XP 2500+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

FMA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 827E and Athlon XP 2500+ are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 827E and Athlon XP 2500+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066no data
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 827E 0.23
+53.3%
Athlon XP 2500+ 0.15

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 827E 371
+60.6%
Athlon XP 2500+ 231

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.23 0.15
Chip lithography 32 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 68 Watt

Celeron 827E has a 53.3% higher aggregate performance score, a 306.3% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.

The Celeron 827E is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon XP 2500+ in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 827E is a notebook processor while Athlon XP 2500+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 827E and Athlon XP 2500+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 827E
Celeron 827E
AMD Athlon XP 2500+
Athlon XP 2500+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 827E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 35 votes

Rate Athlon XP 2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 827E or Athlon XP 2500+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.