Ultra 9 285T vs Celeron 807UE

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 807UE and Core Ultra 9 285T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3361not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency1.43no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release dateno data7 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$549

Detailed specifications

Celeron 807UE and Core Ultra 9 285T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Performance-coresno data8
Efficient-coresno data16
Threads124
Base clock speedno data1.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1 GHz5.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier10no data
L1 cache64 KB192 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache1.5 MB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm3 nm
Die size131 mm2243 mm2
Number of transistors504 Million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 807UE and Core Ultra 9 285T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socketno dataFCLGA1851
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 807UE and Core Ultra 9 285T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Celeron 807UE and Core Ultra 9 285T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 807UE and Core Ultra 9 285T are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 807UE and Core Ultra 9 285T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1333DDR5-6400
Maximum memory size4 GB192 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidth10.662 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)Intel® Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data2 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 807UE and Core Ultra 9 285T integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 807UE and Core Ultra 9 285T integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4K @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 8K @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDPno data4K @ 60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data8K @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 807UE and Core Ultra 9 285T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 807UE and Core Ultra 9 285T.

PCIe versionno data5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 24
Threads 1 24
Chip lithography 32 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron 807UE has 250% lower power consumption.

Ultra 9 285T, on the other hand, has 2300% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 966.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 807UE and Core Ultra 9 285T. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron 807UE is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 9 285T is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 807UE
Celeron 807UE
Intel Core Ultra 9 285T
Core Ultra 9 285T

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 807UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 7 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron 807UE and Core Ultra 9 285T, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.