Ultra 9 288V vs Celeron 807

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 807
2012
1 core / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.25
Core Ultra 9 288V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 30 Watt
12.52
+4908%

Core Ultra 9 288V outperforms Celeron 807 by a whopping 4908% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 807 and Core Ultra 9 288V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3170623
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency1.3939.47
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date1 July 2012 (12 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$70no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 807 and Core Ultra 9 288V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Performance-coresno data4
Low Power Efficient-coresno data4
Threads28
Base clock speed1.5 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/s37 MHz
Multiplier15no data
L1 cache64K (per core)192 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache1.5 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm3 nm
Die size131 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors504 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 807 and Core Ultra 9 288V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1023FCBGA2833
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 807 and Core Ultra 9 288V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Celeron 807 and Core Ultra 9 288V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 807 and Core Ultra 9 288V are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 807 and Core Ultra 9 288V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size16 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel Arc Graphics 140V
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequency950 MHz2.05 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 807 and Core Ultra 9 288V integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported23
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 807 and Core Ultra 9 288V integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDPno data3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 807 and Core Ultra 9 288V integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.2
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 807 and Core Ultra 9 288V.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes164
PCI supportno data5.0 and 4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 807 0.25
Ultra 9 288V 12.52
+4908%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 807 392
Ultra 9 288V 19895
+4975%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.25 12.52
Integrated graphics card 0.77 13.29
Recency 1 July 2012 24 September 2024
Physical cores 1 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 30 Watt

Celeron 807 has 76.5% lower power consumption.

Ultra 9 288V, on the other hand, has a 4908% higher aggregate performance score, 1626% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 12 years, 700% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 966.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 9 288V is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 807 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 807 and Core Ultra 9 288V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 807
Celeron 807
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
Core Ultra 9 288V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4 votes

Rate Celeron 807 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 35 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 288V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 807 or Core Ultra 9 288V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.