Core i9-14900 vs Celeron 725C
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 725C and Core i9-14900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 116 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 52.22 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | no data |
| Release date | 1 July 2011 (13 years ago) | 1 January 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Current price | no data | $601 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron 725C and Core i9-14900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | no data |
| Threads | 1 | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.3 GHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 1.5 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | no data |
| Die size | 131 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 504 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 725C and Core i9-14900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA1023 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | no data |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 725C and Core i9-14900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 725C and Core i9-14900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 89.6 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | no data | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 725C and Core i9-14900.
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 July 2011 | 1 January 2024 |
i9-14900 has an age advantage of 12 years.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 725C and Core i9-14900. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron 725C is a notebook processor while Core i9-14900 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 725C and Core i9-14900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
