Ryzen 3 3350U vs Celeron 6205
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1739 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Tiger Lake | Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) |
| Power efficiency | no data | 9.20 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Tiger Lake U (2020) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| Release date | 1 September 2020 (5 years ago) | 6 January 2019 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 6205 and Ryzen 3 3350U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2/2 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 160 KB | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 2.5 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 12 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4500 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 6205 and Ryzen 3 3350U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | BGA1499 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 6205 and Ryzen 3 3350U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 6205 and Ryzen 3 3350U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (400 MHz) | AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 4.26 | 2.80 |
| Recency | 1 September 2020 | 6 January 2019 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 12 nm |
Celeron 6205 has 52.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.
Ryzen 3 3350U, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron 6205 and AMD Ryzen 3 3350U. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
