EPYC 4484PX vs Celeron 6205

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 6205 and EPYC 4484PX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated120
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data50.04
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Tiger Lakeno data
Architecture codenameTiger Lake U (2020)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date1 September 2020 (4 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 6205 and EPYC 4484PX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads224
Base clock speedno data4.4 GHz
Boost clock speedno data5.6 GHz
L1 cache160 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2.5 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm5 nm
Die sizeno data2x 71 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data47 °C
Number of transistorsno data17,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 6205 and EPYC 4484PX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA1499AM5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 6205 and EPYC 4484PX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 6205 and EPYC 4484PX are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 6205 and EPYC 4484PX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUsAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 6205 and EPYC 4484PX.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data28

Pros & cons summary


Integrated graphics card 4.48 1.98
Recency 1 September 2020 21 May 2024
Physical cores 2 12
Threads 2 24
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 120 Watt

Celeron 6205 has 126.3% faster integrated GPU, and 700% lower power consumption.

EPYC 4484PX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 6205 and EPYC 4484PX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron 6205 is a notebook processor while EPYC 4484PX is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 6205 and EPYC 4484PX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 6205
Celeron 6205
AMD EPYC 4484PX
EPYC 4484PX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Celeron 6205 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate EPYC 4484PX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 6205 or EPYC 4484PX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.