EPYC 9645 vs Celeron J4115

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4115 and EPYC 9645 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2061not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Gemini Lakeno data
Power efficiency15.98no data
Architecture codenameGemini Lake (2019)Turin (2024)
Release date4 November 2019 (5 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,048

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4115 and EPYC 9645 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)96
Threads4192
Base clock speed1.8 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4115 and EPYC 9645 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA1090SP5
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4115 and EPYC 9645. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vPro-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron J4115 and EPYC 9645 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4115 and EPYC 9645 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4115 and EPYC 9645. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 600N/A
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4115 and EPYC 9645 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4115 and EPYC 9645 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J4115 and EPYC 9645 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4115 and EPYC 9645.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes6128
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 November 2019 10 October 2024
Physical cores 4 96
Threads 4 192
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 320 Watt

Celeron J4115 has 3100% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9645, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron J4115 and EPYC 9645. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron J4115 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9645 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4115 and EPYC 9645, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4115
Celeron J4115
AMD EPYC 9645
EPYC 9645

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 135 votes

Rate Celeron J4115 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9645 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4115 or EPYC 9645, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.